by Roni
Do you trust the United States government?  Probably not, many
don’t.  The only people who truly trust their leaders are those who expect to receive their “entitlements.”  Those people who have never worked a day in their adult lives, which father babies and then ski- doddle leaving a young foolish girl behind with a baby bump. The girl heads either to the Welfare Department or to the abortion clinic. 
Either way; all three loses.


Obama does not care about children.  Perhaps he loves the two girls who live
in luxury at the White House, but for the rest of the babies and children; he
could care less. He likes to surround himself with children when he uses them for his own purpose or to indoctrinate them into his warped sense of Marxism.

Remember he said, when trying to shove his healthcare down American’s throats, that taking a child to the ER was un-necessary if the child was having an asthma attack. 
He played doctor, counselor and God, and continues on with his rant.

“If there’s a blue pill and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that’s going to make you well.”

Sounds like perhaps he is in the wrong profession. When did he hang out
his Barack Obama, MD on duty sign?

The new rule as of 2/3/2013 handed down by Health and Human Service, states employers pay for abortions and sterilization.  The new rule includes churches that have employees.

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, began her escapade against black women.  She wanted all black babies killed before they were born.  Population control

Progressives desire population control.

Insurance companies-lower cost-less
births. Population control.

Abortions-population control (at the expense of others).

Cost for abortions, until recently was hidden from employers who work in a religious
  setting.

So, Obama played medical doctor by telling Americans to take a blue pill instead of a red pill, and now he feels he is qualified to be THE PSYCHIATRIST for all the nation.

“Guns cannot fall into the hand of mentally ill people.”

So, who is mentally ill?  Apparently Obama thinks All Americans.  After all, he's the Psychiatrist...right?  He makes the laws, others follow.

In the 70’s and 80’s the Soviets used the same scheme to quiet their contenders. 
When the people could not abide by the rules, they were labeled mentally ill.  If they did not believe in Communism, or believed in God, according to the Soviet dictatorship, they had to be “crazy”.

The U. S. government has decided to establish who is mentally ill, and who is not mentally ill.

Have you taken any antidepressant medication lately? If so, they can
qualify you as a mentally ill person.

Do you attend church and worship God?  You must then be mentally ill,
according to the stipulations made by the U. S government.

If your religious sect requires you to follow a dress code…guess what? 
The U. S government thinks you are crazy.  Women must follow Michell's dress code in order to be "fashion correct..."  NOT!!!!

Are you a high school drop out?  Regardless of the reason, the government can use that against you and proclaim you to be mentally unstable.

If you are a happy person who takes life one day at a time. The government
can declare you a mental case because you don’t “live in the real world.”

Honestly, as“Crazy” as this all sounds, it is for real. America is facing a turbulent time.  Next week, tomorrow, or while we sleep, plans are being made to take away the rights of American citizens and destroying the Constitution; starting with the first and second amendment.

Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican teamed with Michelle Bachman-R-Minnesota requested an investigation on Huma Abedin, who’s family is associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, and who is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s top Aide, both Democrats and Republicans protested against the investigation.

In 1991, Huma was on the Executive Board of Muslim Student Association which is a Muslim Brotherhood front group.  The group believes their job is destroying American civilization from within – what better way to fulfill their self-claimed sanction than one of their own infiltrating into the Secretary of States affairs of U.S. policies?


Michelle Bachman, questioned about Muslims in U.S. government to the outrage of John McCain, a Republican from Arizona.  After procuring Gaffney Center for Security Policy guidelines which by the wording gave Bachman and Gohmert the go-ahead for investigation, John McCain said, “Sinister! nothing less than an unwarranted and unfounded attack on an honorable woman, a dedicated American and a loyal public servant.”

Dana Milbank a journalist with Washington Post stated that the investigation is motivated by racism and is only due to the way Abedin looks and her type of worship. 

If Obama is infiltrating Muslim Brotherhood into the U. S. government, what is the reason?  One theory is to overthrow the U. S. Military by supplying the Muslim Brotherhood Regime in Egypt with F-16’s and M-1 tanks.  These people are America’s
enemy.

Paul Rand took a congressional vote to stop all sales, transfers, retransfers, etc. to Egypt.  Only 19 Republicans voted in favor.  The vote was 79-19.

More than likely the vote proved evident that Chuck Hagel will be the next Secretary of Defense.  Chuck Hagel is a sympathizer of the Middle East. 
He also hates Israel, and is in staunch favor of slashing every branch of
the U. S. Military.  He also believes that America should not remain the Superpower of the world.

Don’t you know the Communist leaders are reeling with glee and are a cheer leader group for Chuck Hagel’s agenda?  

Louie Goumert interviewed Janet Napolitano before the committee.  He asked her
if she knew how many members of her advisory committee is Muslim. 
Her answer; “I do not know.”

As always, Communist performance involves children. Muslim Brotherhood has
linked with U. S. Department of Education.  Their aim is providing online programs to all U. S. Schools with Muslim Schools. “Connect All Schools” project is authorized by Varian Gregorian fro Qatar Foundation.  Gregorian wasappointed in 2009 by Obama as Fellowship Commissioner.  

The project start-up was a birthed by William Ayers and chaired by Barack Obama.  Obama said his position on the project qualified him to run for public office.

In the same year Gregorian was appointed to his position, Obama spoke to an Arab group in Cairo, Egypt.  “Create a new online network so a young person in Kansas can communicate instantly with a young person in Cairo.”

Has American parents become so weakened by this atrocious administration that they will put their trust in government and allow their children to participate in Muslim Jihad preparedness?  The Muslim intent is to overtake America, destroy American freedom and kill those who worship Jesus Christ rather than Mohammad. 

Over 100 schools in America has already linked to the program which the Qatar hopes will be in full swing and all American schools will be linked in by 2016.

Qatar is based in Washington, D.C. and is an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood.

It’s a shame that any government would indoctrinate children into their devious, diabolical schemes.  However, what is more shameful is that American parents would permit their children to attend a school in America where Middle East and Un-American
policies are corrupting their minds.

By Roni

The country was left reeling when John Roberts, Chief Justice of Supreme Court changed his vote on Obama healthcare; the question was “why.”

Chicago style politics apparently raised its ugly head and discovered the adoption records of the Roberts children.

Of course John Roberts and his wife should be held accountable for breaking the law, but then he is Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and apparently feels he is above the law of the land.

The word was that the two children were from Latin America, but it turned out they are not.  They were both born in Ireland where adoptions are a bit more stringent
than in Latin America.

It was reported that Mr. Chief Justice himself described the adoptions as a “private adoption.”  There are no private adoptions in Ireland; all adoptions must go through
the Irish government.

The mothers of the two children, who were of Irish decent, were transported into Latin America territory, taking their children with them.  The children were then adopted through a“private adoption program.”

Ireland has a vast order of adoption laws and strictly prohibits private adoptions. 
The Roberts without question knew they were not eligible to adopt in
Ireland; thus moving the two separate mothers to Latin America. 
One of the Irish stipulations is the adoptive parents must claim residency in Ireland for one year prior to adoption. Rather than take a year’s leave from his Supreme Court duties, Chief Justice decided to break the law and get two Irish children through black
market.

When the Court got the healthcare placed before them for consideration and voting for or against the debacle, the country feared not that Chief Justice would be voting against it.  He surprised the nation when he voted in favor of it but changing it to a
tax, which involved the IRS.  The IRS, as Chief Justice Roberts knew at the time he voted, is in the playing field to apply pressure on anyone who does not want to cooperate in Obama’s healthcare.

Obama, as America knows him, has no consciences. He has often attacked
below the belt to get his way.  Either John Roberts vote in favor of the unscrupulous bill or his adoption process would be exposed.  Apparently the adoption process was extremely illegal.  John Roberts and his wife should by all means, both be held
accountable. However, to get his healthcare bill passed Obama and his cronies would go to any extreme.  Yet, Obama’s past is locked away disallowing anyone the opportunity to explore his tainted past.  In reality, where did his children come from?

One would think that Michelle and Barry would have been exuberant about her pregnancy for both girls.  Yet there are no photo’s (as well as they like being photographed), showing a pregnant Michelle.  Taking into consideration, neither girl resembles their parents; or one another for that matter.  Is the "ownership" of his two daughters also amoungst the hidden documemts he dares not to allow to become public?

Obama will go to any extreme to ensure the passing of his agenda; if children are hurt in the process; so be it.  Rather than cower down to the evil tactics of Obama, one would imagine Chief Justice Roberts would contest the evilness brought to the Court; but then, how could he?  He himself has committed an atrocity.  

John Roberts should by all accounts, step down from his rewarding, hallowed seat as Chief Justice and face the consequences.  In the meantime, Obama should be investigated. Perhaps a tantalizing approach would be to investigate Obama and his “locked-up files” the down and dirty way…Chicago-style Politics.

Are the children and the black-market adoption the reason American citizens must suffer the consequences of a government out of control?  Did John Roberts vote in favor of the healthcare bill due to a threat which would expose his dishonorable behavior?  That perhaps is a question that will never allow a correct answer; but the secret about the children’s adoption is out and the public knows that Chief Justice Roberts feels he has reached the same plateau as Obama.  They both, by their performance proves they feel they are above the law.

{Chapter 1, Page 16;

"Absentmindedly, he returned the receiver to its cradle. With eyes focused on nothing of present, Michael remained captured in thought. 
 Mayor Lloyd could not have seen Mr. Rayller, he's been dead several years. However, if Mayor Lloyd days he saw who he thinks he saw, that would contradict Mr. Rayller's death. On the other hand, would it? The entire Rayller family is dead; two by car accident, one with a heart attack, and Mr. Rayller's granddaughter was murdered.
Stirred by the telephone call from Mayor Lloyd, the memory of the Rayller family stood prominent in his mind. Michael, years earlier, had learned to listen and trust his gut feelings. His gut now told him this was happening for a particular reason.
The memory of Mr. Rayller's granddaughter, Shelia Rayller, again reasserted itself. The nagging questions, once forced to the rear of his mind, burst forward from the slight crack in the door of memory caused by Mayor Lloyd. Its return came like a tidal wave, sweeping aside everything in his mind as the  memories tore through his conscisous thought. The sense of urgency increased with such intensity it was frightening. Forcing himself to calm down, he struggled to organize his thoughts."}

This novel and other titles by other authors can be found on the link below and other online bookstores. http://www.olarobooks.com/index.html

By Roni

Capitalism is a term most politicians sidestep. They shun it because it takes the power away from them and places it on the individuals; so the individuals may be unrestricted to live their lives in sovereignty and under their own authority without intrusion from the government.

This government administration has shown
they want complete control over the people; rather than the people having
control over the government, they elect to ploy those who are less fortunate
into believing they have the same entitlements due them, as those who worked
meticulously in order to acquire wealth.  The Socialist agenda expresses the desire that wealth from the fortunate must be shared with the less fortunate. 
Submission to this notion is absurd.  Believing the government will supply
every need for individuals or a group of people is farfetched. 
The end result for entitlement grabbers will be extremely negative. 

In the beginnings of Socialist countries the dictators used the same methods on their people.  When suddenly the “entitlements” were stripped away the people starved to death, their homes were taken from them, they were not permitted medical treatment, and they were placed in work camps.  Work camps constituted by
the government and controlled by government soldiers and guards. 
If any of those incarcerated were incapable of working; they were
killed.

Joseph Stalin a Russian dictator, turned a retrograde Soviet Union into a super power; but that turn around was at the cost of many human lives which included all the old leaders appointed by his predecessor Linin. His main objective was to discount Capitalism. Millions lost their lives under the control of Stalin.

Karl Marx, one of the founding fathers of Socialism, who also relished his deep disdain for Capitalism, did not believe an individual could make their own decisions.  For example; buying or selling personal property. Therefore, the government mingled into the personal business of the people.  The devastation of Socialism is in reality; do as the government orders. 

The establishment of Socialism has cost millions
upon millions of citizens their lives.  Mao Ts Tung, killed 80,000 thousand of his own people, those he didn’t have murdered; starved to death.

Living in Socialism if not governmentally connected, one will live an insolvent life. Socialism has no treaty.  It intercedes and grabs individuality destroying the family unit working steadily on individuals who will weaken to their corrupt government
profile.  Those who surrender become slaves; those who do not surrender die.  

Socialism is a great price to pay for “free  entitlements.”  Whoopi Goldberg,
who at one time in her life confesses to being on welfare, but managed through a strong will to achieve a popularity standing. She believes there is nothing wrong with Communism.  If and when the tables turn, she will hardheadedly recognize the widespread devastation of a rampant government.  The status quo, regardless of public admiration, will be the same for all individuals.

January 17, 2013 Barrack Obama signed 23 Executive orders, hoping to persuade Congress to vote into law; his self-claimed authority to ban guns.  His uncanny
comportment broke an enormous portion from American style freedom. 
He went headstrong against any Constitutional law, yet he did it under
the guise of protecting children.  Hitler often had young children beside him when he addressed his nation.  The 2nd Amendment was eradicated by the stroke of Obama’pen.  That’Socialism!  That’s tyranny.

The Constitution of the United States has been scorned by this president.  His aloofness against the Constitution is simple.  The Constitution eliminates his power and places it with the people.  In order to establish a Socialist regime, Obama must first destroy the document that profusely protects his subjects. If the gun ban law passes Congress, the only resource left to continue in a free Capitalist county is for the state to use nullification against the Federal government.  Nullifying the decision made by the president can often be a laborious task, but in this episode tyranny and perhaps treason has been committed. Basically it’s a war against the constitutional rights of freedom for the people.  January 21,(because the 20th falls on Sunday) 2013, Obama, at one point in the inauguration, will swear on the Holy Bible the presidential oath, which apparently has a different concept to him than it does to American citizens.  
 
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."


PRESERVE: 
Keep or maintain in unaltered
condition.


PROTECT: 
Shield from danger, destruction or
damage.


DEFEND:   Speak or argue in defense of any
act or attack and fight for it.

In heart the oath this president makes is repulsive.  His swearing in, behind
a toothy grin, is an abomination, contaminated dreams of grandeur associated
with dictatorial attributes, where he will be king of a One World Order where
  Socialism/Communism reigns.   

Information from Roni...

Two schools in San Antonio, Texas has opted to be pilot schools to engage in the privacy of children while they are in school.


According to the letter sent to parents, children who attend school in the North side district schools of San Antonio are required to wear a uniform ID card. 
These same schools recently implemented camera’s throughout the
campus.  The cameras which constitute, in regards to the children, a safety attribute. 
But the required ID cards have gone so far as to stir up concern with the ACLU.


The parents were apparently notified by a letter after the new school session commenced informing them of their children’s ID’s.


The pilot program is called The Student Locator Program. It transmits to a
data base the whereabouts of each student while they are in the school.  As the letter states,“after all parents, you want us to know where your children
are…”


The ID cards are used in the cafeteria lunch lines and to take books from the school library. 
 

The letter informs parents that the cards contain no personal information, and they go into the importance of children wearing the cards at all times while on campus.  If they hold no personal information how then are they using them to keep track of each child? 
Even the name of a child is considered personal information in most areas. Also, the cards do not work after the child leaves the school building.


If a child does not show up for school that said child is reported to their parents in hope of curbing kids from just casually “skipping” school.


 
If the cards only work in the school, what is the benefit?  If they were implementing safety would it not have been wise to put a tracking devise in the card that would ensure the child arrived home safely?


At the near end of the letter the parents are informed that if the card is lost there will be a fine.  Parents are encouraged to talk to their children about the program and
hearten them about the program as,“as we believe it will increase student safety
as well generate additional funds for Jones Middle School.” 

The letter is not signed, but has a website
listed for Q&A.


Can a hacker hack into the system and gather personal information on a child using the issued number on their ID card?  The answer was, “nothing is
100%”…however they are saying it would take a great effort to hack the system
since all records are obtained at the Board of Education needing passcodes etc.
to locate records.


If this pilot program has the ACLU up in arms, parents in all areas should be concerned. 
Not often does the ACLU do anything that meets the criteria of American people, but this time they are exactly correct.  This should not be happening.  The next step will most likely be; to plant RFID chips permanently into school children. 
Parents beware!!!  The next pilot” school could be your children’s school. Is this technology a modern day program to indoctrinate children?  Time will tell, time will most certainly tell.

By L. M. O'Neal

A gun will do the same thing in the hand of a robber or police person, if loaded, it will fire a bullet and strike something or someone a distance away or immediately near. It will frighten, injure and even kill. A rock can frighten, injure and kill. A knife can do the same also, as well as an archers bow and arrow. Nearly any object or item and do the same thing, but a gun possesses a special quality. With today’s design, it can cause injury and death at rapid rate and with very little effort.

There is no need to string another arrow in the bow, stretch it back, aim and release the arrow, to cause injury. With a gun a (person) need only pull the trigger or press a button and out comes another bullet, as long as it has ammunition. This capability coupled with a desire or intent to defend one's self, rights, property, family and country is what Communist fear. They do not want individuals, not under their control, having the ability to fight back. As a result, the 20th Century saw over a billion people murder under Centralized Government Regimes; Communist. What does this have to do with Obama and Progressives?

President Obama is an admitted Progressive, which makes him a Communist. By observation, his policies, actions, Executive Orders and political posturing has consistently been anti-American, Anti-capitalist, anti-liberty, anti-business and anti-Christian, but Pro-Islamist and Pro Muslim-Brotherhood. His actions also strongly indicate he is also not a Christian, as he has claimed, but Muslim. In and of itself, being Muslim is not a crime, but supporting actions against the United States, is. This is called Treason. For the reasons above, it is essential for that Progressives and President Obama successfully disarm America.

As America slides further into debt, more and more stress will be heaped on the backs of the American working taxpayer. In a country claiming to be free to pursue their dreams, reality of over taxation, over regulation and an unconstitutionally intrusive government will foster and cultivate anger, which is what Obama wants. When that anger turns against the real villains, which is the people in the different forms of government, federal, state and local, the second amendment will take on new meaning. When citizens finally recognize a tyrannical government for what it is, those in power will have great reason to fear.

In an effort to force the general public into capitulation, a method of voluntarily forcing civilians to surrender their guns, must be created. This is being accomplished through events such as the “Sandy Hook Shooting”, Aurora theater shooting, the “Fort Hood Shooting” and others past and to come in the future. When the populous determines its current form of government is sponsoring, cultivating and creating lethal criminals, the government is the criminal and a threat to the people. Before this happens the government must find a way to get the guns from the law abiding populous in hopes of preserving its power by disarming the country. When that task has been complete, then the government can eliminate the undesirables at will and without much resistance. When this happens, WELCOME TO OBAMA'S FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE, COMMUNISM AND GOVERNMENT MASS MURDER IN AMERICA.

By L. M. O'Neal

More efficient and effective killing machinery was invented for the purpose threatening, maiming and killing. As a result, those most lacking in ethics, morals and integrity most easily sought and gained access to the most lethal of weaponry. Again, why does this matter?

Tyranny by definition means;

1

:oppressive power<every form of tyranny over the mind of man — Thomas Jefferson>; especially : oppressive power exerted by government <the tyranny of a police state>

2

a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state

b : the office, authority, and administration of a tyrant

3

: a rigorous condition imposed by some outside agency or force <living under the tyranny of the clock — Dixon Wecter>

4

: an oppressive, harsh, or unjust act : a tyrannical act<workers who had suffered tyrannies>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tyranny

Tyranny by any definition is anti-human and brutal. The 20th century proved itself to be one of the deadliest centuries known to man. Killing machinery at the hands of “little gods” like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Linen, Po Pot, Charves, religious groups such as radical Islamist and others made elimination of opposing individuals and groups possible. What's left when the opposition has been murdered, Tyranny.

None will dare openly oppose mass murders, but are force to operate underground and covertly. Any open desire to resist often resulted in imprisonment till death, or murder. But, this level of extermination could not have been accomplished at the magnitude of over a billion murdered under Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Theocracy or any other tyrannical form of centralized government, if the populous was not first made defenseless. In other words, they were unarmed and therefore denied the right and responsibility of self defense. But, why do guns matter?

A gun is an inanimate object. It can not clean itself. It can not move itself. It can not load, point or fire itself. Any actions or functions a gun takes, requires the involvement of a user. The user is usually the person holding the gun. Because of its design a gun has limited purposes and uses. It can be used as a hammer, a paper weight or even a door stop. If a gun of any design, is used as it was designed and intended, it is a weapon and as a weapon, it can be used as aggression or for protection. What causes fear to Liberals and Communist alike is its use for personal protection first, and aggression against
Centralized Government Tyranny second. But, why do Progressives fear guns?

Progressives in the United States, are Communist, they will change their labels often and depending on how detrimental the label has become. In the 1920's and '30's, they called themselves Communist. When popularity of that term became unfavorable, they became liberals. When the term “Liberal” proved to mean anti-American, it changed to Progressive. All the terms, Progressive, Liberal, Fabian Socialist, Socialist, Nazi's, Marxist, Maoist all are Communist and can be found in large numbers in the Democrat Party, a little lesser in the Republican Party. They all are doing in the same direction, but at a different pace and from a different direction with the same goal; the destruction of America. But, what does this have to do with guns?

TO BE CONTINUED

 -Part 1

BY L. M. O'Neal

America is no longer a FREE COUNTRY. In a free country, ruled by law, with a foundation built on defined rights and wrongs, it is necessary that such a countries citizens retain the ability to protect its self from attack of any sort. This includes attack from citizen criminals as well as “government criminals”. What is a government criminal?

Attorney General Eric Holder allowed “Operation Fast and Furious” to take place under his watch. This operation allowed and facilitated the sale and transportation of illegal automatic, semi-automatic weapons, and other deadly small arms armaments, to be sold to drug cartels and other criminals into the country of Mexico. These weapons sold to Mexico's criminal enterprises was patterned after a similar operation undertaken under former President George W. Bush with with a major exception. The Obama Administration created no method of tracking the weapons sold. Was this an error on their part or a deliberately eliminated step of safety?

If it was an over site on the part of the administration, the individual(s) responsible for insuring the safety of the general public, in the countries affected, should be held accountable and prosecuted. However, if not providing a method for tracking weapons capable of creating mass casualties, was deliberately not implemented, this is criminal intent and should also be prosecuted, even if it includes the Attorney General of the United States.

As a result of lax or intentional negligence, a large number of people have died from these guns including United Stated Border Agents and Mexican citizens estimated to number in the hundreds, but accountability has been lacking. So, how does this affect gun control in the United States?

First and foremost, gun control in the United States, instituted by the Federal Government, is illegal according to the 2cd Amendment of the Constitution.

“Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

in no way does the Second Amendment state the Federal Government has the right to regulate who gets to own a gun or weapon. Neither does it say what type of weapon may be owned. Nor does it say criminals, civilian or government sponsored and supported, has a right to bear arms. Nor does it say anything about the President of the United States being the final authority of the stated Amendment. Rights not specificly granted to the Federal Government, shall reside with the state and its citizens. Any decision outside of those made by individual states, is an infringement on the rights of the states and its citizens, and a usurping of powers not granted under the Constitution of The United States. But, why does it matter?

The natural enemy to Individual Freedom is TYRANNY by a Centralized Government. Centralized government control has been a mass murdering, private property seizing, slavery protecting enterprise of the elitist, destined to self destruct from its introduction and inception into humanity. Pagans of ancient times tried it, giving absolute rule and authority to the King and Chief of the tribe, Island, country or continent. Up until the 20th century, wholesale and full scale mass murder was limited to warring factions and within their respective communities.

In the late 19th century, Karl Marx introduced Communism to the world and with it the lust for innocent blood and that of any in opposition. No longer were the egomaniacs seeking to be “little gods” in their own regions, but now had an accurate measurement of the entire planet and sought to own or control it.

TO BE CONTINUED

+++Roni+++
 
There are those that believe the man sitting in the Oval Office has an ego problem.  An inflated ego such as that of BarrackHussein Obama, should not be confused with self-confidence.  

Self-confidence is a trait many possess. And possess, it proudly as it should be.  It is  show of concern for the way you present and conduct yourself. 
you are assured in your own self, which is not a bad thing. 
An overly self-confident person often ends up being egotistical and once
that blossoms they become the only subject of interest to
themselves.

It is very apparent that Mr. Obama is self-inflated. His
self-confidence expanded to egotism and egotism to Narcissism. 
Narcissism derived from Greek Mythology.  According to the myth a young man named
Narcissus rejected love from Echo because he was so in love with his own image
he found in a pool of water. 
However, being unable to consummate his love for himself; he turned into
a flower - flower that still today carries his name.

In 1899, Paul Nache used Narcissism in a
research he conducted on sexual perversion.

1911, Otto Rank published a psychoanalytical paper specifically concerned with Narcissism, linking it to Vanity and self- admiration.  

In addition, Martin Buber in 1923 published
an essay called" Ich and Du" which means, I and Thou. 
In his essay he pointed out Narcissism often leads the Narcissistic
person to believe others are mere objects instead of
equals.

A person who experiences Narcissism has a
mindset that they are smarter, better, and their physical appearance out ranks
any other. Most generally a Narcissistic individual is covering up their own insecurities with their thoughts of grandeur. They believe
their arrogance produces profit to their benefit.

The following information, (some paraphrased),
was found on psychologywiki.com.

A strongly arrogant person will downplay
others achievements in order to make themselves appear better. 
Keep in mind here about Obama’s attempt to downplay any and all
achievements George W. Bush ever accomplished.  For instance the tax
cuts.

An arrogant Narcissistic person cannot
accept good ideas from others though others ideas may be better than his
own.  Nor can he accept another’s point of view on any subject no matter how logical or correct it is.  In this case, take into consideration the battle that commenced over the Obama health care bill.  Disregarding all the smoke and mirrors, he gave medical advice he was not qualified to give when he said an Asthmatic child should not be taken to the
emergency room; just give them a red or blue pill. That was his argument and he was sticking to it regardless.

This particular type of personality forces people to do what he wants done though the person or persons are against it. The overly inflated person has little regard for others feelings and does not consider their best interest.  This exposes
his promise to put every issue on C-Span so the American people could see the
transparency in his Administration. 
Though he never followed through with that promise, he shoved every bill
that did not pass Congress through with an Executive Order, regardless of how
the citizens felt.  He shows no regard whatsoever to the American citizen’s wishes 
.
A person who experiences this particular disorder has a built in mechanism that if he is deflated he will regain his superiority status by downgrading someone else. 
How many times have you watched Obama degrade another person? 
Most generally he directed his deflated state toward George W. Bush even
at one point claiming him to be unpatriotic.  It’s called Magical Thinking when their
mistakes are directed toward another. He truly believes he makes no mistakes.  He believes he is a perfect vessel, otherwise he would not cherish his own being.

Envy, another trait of the Narcissistic mind, is a 
need to project a persona of superiority and perfection.  

Entitlement is another mindset of the
Narcissistic personality.  They
must continually encourage others of their ability.  And because of their self proclaimed ability they must have preferential treatment simply because they feel they are special.  Without the highest esteem they will go into a rage. 
That rage has been apparent to the public more than once.  It showed it's ugly head in the 2012 debates.

Exploitation, using others without respect for their feelings or well- being, usually others are in a subservient position where resistance is difficult or impossible.  Well, that pretty well covers all American citizens don't you think?  It is most difficult and sorely impossible to resist his deplorable actions when he is strutting before a camera in DC, and his subservients are anywhere in the USA.

A person with a Narcissistic personality disorder does not feel they have boundaries. Other people simply exist to meet their needs. If a person cannot meet the needs of a Narcissistic, then they have no reason to exist at all.  This particular summation leads to the gun banning action. If his wife, sister or one of his daughters was cornered and unarmed and a 250 pound rapist stood before her wielding a long knife blade, would he still feel it necessary to make his ego arise to his perfection and ban all weapons?  Or would he reconsider.  No!  He would not reconsider, his children and wife are protected with armed guards.  Also, keep in mind; he has no boundaries, hmakes the laws with the stroke of a pen and America must abide by them.

It’s all smoke and mirrors via the Sandy Hook School tragedy and mental patients acquiring guns as his reasoning behind overriding the 2ndAmendment. 
If mental illness issues are one of his priorities for a gun ban law, perhaps his guards should not be permitted to carry firearms.  Narcissism is considered a psychological problem. People with psychological disorders, should not be in the presence of firearms…period.